maybe its not healthy being so openminded, so condusive to new ideas, actions or choices.. to almost be devoid of any sort of conceptual boundaries.. perhaps it would not be so bad if one were only to conceive from some purely clinical vantage point.... however, one could argue that acceptance of ideas can result simply due to familiarity.. and deviant habitual actions could easily be accomodated by a beaten path of rationalization.. in these cases at what point does openmindedness interfere with moral integrity, can there be total coexistence between the two? at what point is openmindedness seen to be the originator of weakness, deviance, or insanity, when superimposed upon the loose set of universal moral principles.. when does it slip from the positive to the negative end of its definition.. maybe it is not a problem of the mind, simply a weakness of the soul?.. i'll finish this thought another time.. maybe im not openminded enough